{"id":2747,"date":"1999-05-15T13:51:33","date_gmt":"1999-05-15T19:51:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.draugas.org\/news\/?p=2747"},"modified":"2016-02-14T09:14:21","modified_gmt":"2016-02-14T15:14:21","slug":"lithuanian-profiles-science-fictions-shining-seer","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.draugas.org\/news\/lithuanian-profiles-science-fictions-shining-seer\/","title":{"rendered":"Lithuanian Profiles: Science Fiction’s Shining Seer"},"content":{"rendered":"

By Tom Gregg<\/p>\n

\"1999-05-15-LHERITAGE-03\"<\/p>\n

He was again looking out at night-softened Manhattan. \u201cAre you still confident that no one has deduced our -ah- personal dynamic ? \u201d \u201cPerfectly confident.\u201d Domino was shocked at the suggestion. \u00a0\u201cNo one knows that you and I run the world.\u00a0\u2014 Algis Budrys, Michaelmas<\/p>\n

Science Fiction deals largely with the future, but the present is looking well for it too. The SciFi rack at the bookstore has grown as big as the Romance section. \u201cThe X Files\u201d and \u201cStarship Troopers\u201d play to vast visual audiences. Veteran SciFi fans like to point out that advances like the desktop computer and the Internet were convincingly brought to life, years ahead of their time, in prophetic works of SciFi. The genre\u2019s profile, almost nil until a generation ago, has never been higher.
\n\"1999-05-15-LHERITAGE-02\"
\nWhy Science Fiction took so long to catch on is anyone\u2019s guess. As an art form it dates back to Englishwoman Mary Shelley\u2019s bombshell 1821 novel Frankenstein, but SciFi remained unfashionable across the Atlantic for almost a century and a half. Strange too is the fact that SciFi\u2019s slow coming of age pivoted on the phenomenal commercial success of a merely good 1977 movie. \u201cStar Wars\u201d became the top grossing film in history to that point, presumably on the strength of its special effects. There\u2019s no question, however, that SciFi annals cleanly and correctly divide into pre- and post-\u201cStar Wars\u201d eras.<\/p>\n

Unquestionably, the best and the bulk of Algis Budrys\u2019 work falls into the pre-\u201cStar Wars\u201d stage. In a twenty-five year stretch beginning in 1952 the longtime writer\/editor authored nearly two hundred books and stories. Worldwide sales of the former (see next page for sketches) totaled hundreds of thousands. That\u2019s an astonishing number in an age when SciFi magazine circulations were struggling to reach four figures. The quality of the output helped Budrys accumulate numerous Hugo Award nominations \u2014 SciFi\u2019s Oscar \u2014 across most of the \u201952-\u201977 span, but he\u2019s primarily identified with the top writers of his earlier years. That small, underappreciated \u201950s group is usually credited now with laying the foundation for what would follow with solid, more upbeat writing than that typifying the 1930s and \u201940s. Slotted as an American pioneer, Budrys\u2019 place in Science Fiction history seems secure.<\/p>\n

Fascinating as much of his writing may be, his narration of the family history comes close to upstaging it. His father Jonas was a dashing figure in his earlier years and rather a man of mystery in his prime after settling into Lithuanian diplomatic circles. Originally picked off a farm by the Tsar\u2019s army, Jonas had been stranded in Vladivostok and put out of a military intelligence job by the 1917 Communist revolution.<\/p>\n

Having worked his way home with armed groups over basically lawless land, he was appointed head of intelligence by the government of newly independent Lithuania. He was instrumental in the liberation of the Klaip\u0117da territory from the French in 1923, and served as its governor until 1925. According to the Lithuanian Encyclopedia, between 1927-1928 Jonas was adviser in the Lithuanian Ministry of the Interior and later served in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. From 1928-1933 he was Lithuanian Consul in Konigsberg, and from 1933-1936 was Consul General in East Prussia. The son maintains that Jonas later may have done intelligence work in conjunction with his diplomatic job, which required worldwide travel to the various consulates. This, of course, would be difficult to verify.<\/p>\n

\"1999-05-15-LHERITAGE-04\"<\/p>\n

By 1931, more definitely, Jonas had married Regina Ka\u0161ubaite and fathered a boy. Algirdas Jonas Budrys began attending kindergarten in Konigsberg, but deteriorating relations with Nazi Germany encouraged the father to transfer with his family to New York City where he assumed the job of Consul General of Lithuania. Algis recalls the family moving twice during his four subsequent years in \u201cThe Big Apple\u201d, relocating each time to a neighborhood of lower stature. Lithuanian money seemed to be growing tight. As it turned out, Lithuanian reserves in U.S. banks would keep the diplomatic offices open even after the Soviet annexation of Lithuania in 1940. But the household cash flow wasn\u2019t enough to dissuade Jonas from buying a Dorothy, New Jersey chicken farm, and dispatching his wife and son 110 miles to run it. Algis had acquired an interest in Science Fiction and written his first story by the time of the New Jersey move.<\/p>\n

Algis proved to be an unmotivated student in Dorothy primary school, a three room\/nine grade affair, and continued the trend at nearby Vineland High School. English was easily his best subject; Physics and Chemistry were a part of the more dismal big picture. \u201cA famous scientist I met [later] once told me, \u2018Budrys, you\u2019d make a lousy scientist\u2019\u201d, Budrys says now. \u201cAnd he was right. I like science, but more in the way of admiring what they can do with it rather than what \/can do with it\u201d. He professes only a utilitarian interest in science as it relates to his work, declaring allegiance to the people branch of SciFi writers dating back to Shelley, as opposed to those who\u2019ve followed the lead of 1860\u2019s Frenchman Jules Verne and his emphasis on machinery. One assumes the latter were better in science class.<\/p>\n

Happy just to have graduated Vineland at sixteen, Budrys authored his most persuasive piece of writing to that point, impressing the University of Miami Florida admissions department enough with an application letter to admit him. He was a virtual baby among the returning combat veterans in school under the G.I. Bill. His nonEnglish grades continued to lag well behind. He did odd jobs to help his parents pay his way, but after two years the money at home ran out. Budrys is sure that by this time his father was subsidizing a number of relatives recently emigrated to the U.S.<\/p>\n

Still only eighteen, he returned to the New York area and worked a number of menial jobs as three more years passed. He cooked, washed dishes, helped build the infamous Levittown subdivision. Faced with a limited science fiction market, he added to his self-written collection of SciFi stories in his free time. The parents, seeing little long term benefit in any of this, urged him to continue his education.<\/p>\n

Consequently, at his own expense he enrolled in Columbia University night school in 1951. There he received the best grades of his life, all A\u2019s and B\u2019s. Doubtless the parents were encouraged. But their dreams of a college degree and a mainstream livelihood for their son were not to be: Algis had his own vision, and in his five off-and-on college years the state of Science Fiction literature had begun to improve. Fantasy and Science Fiction (1949- ) and Galaxy (1950- 80) started long runs as magazines, following John Campbell\u2019s lead at Astounding Science Fiction (1930-).<\/p>\n

\u201cMany of the [SciFi] magazines from the \u201930s and \u201940s had gone out of business,\u201d Budrys says of the early \u201950s scene. \u201cThey had never gotten it quite right. John Campbell, on the other hand, did.\u201d A trained physicist and a successful SciFi writer himself, Campbell had assumed editorship of ASF (now Analog) in 1938. Having hit his editorial stride by the \u201950s, Campbell would discover and nurture names that are legend today. Budrys recalls the thrill of meeting some of the others in Campbell\u2019s New York offices. Heinlein. Dick. Sheckley. The editor may have been more historically significant than any of them, Budrys feels, because he had developed the abilities to gauge reader taste, recognize good writing, and work with writers to polish their submissions. Which, taken together, could be more difficult than writing itself. Regardless, all very quickly in 1952 Campbell bought \u201cHigh Purpose\u201d, Algis sold several more stories from stock, and Columbia lost a night student. He was, as they say in aeronautics, launched.<\/p>\n

As time went along and the writing credits piled up, he would move to Chicago in 1961 to take an editorial position with Regency Books, raise four sons with wife Edna, write a highly regarded book review column for Galaxy, and attain U.S. citizenship. Today he continues to serve as a mentor in the L. Ron Hubbard Writers of the Future program and occasionally guests at one of the country\u2019s many Science Fiction conventions. \u201cHard Landing\u201d (1992) was his last published book, and he currently considers another. He\u2019s still looking, not very hard, for one of those elusive Hugo Awards. He smiles when reminded of the beginner\u2019s luck of Ed Me\u0161kys and Niekas magazine, which despite only a brief run in the mid sixties received a Hugo. \u201cNow what did Americans make of that?\u201d, he wonders, referring to the publication\u2019s name. Since \u201cniekas\u201d is Lithuanian for \u201cnothing\u201d, that would be the perfect answer to his question. But Niekas is history; for writer Budrys the future\u2019s the thing. And in a Science Fiction icon, that seems totally appropriate.
\n\"1999-05-15-LHERITAGE-06a\"\"1999-05-15-LHERITAGE-06d\"<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Want to give Budrys a read? His twelve books can be hard to find, like those of many past Science Fiction masters. So it\u2019s not a bad idea to focus on his most outstanding works. That would be, according to the critics, the three titles listed below. The reader might wish to try the local public library, where this writer obtained each of the three.<\/p>\n

WHO? (1958) Top-level American research scientist Luke Martino is badly hurt in a lab explosion in a town bordering the Iron Curtain. The Soviets, having sifted through the rubble first, return someone claiming to be Martino. But the man has had his head and left arm replaced with prosthetic devices, and Western security is not convinced of his identity. A scientific career and a vital defense project hinge on the outcome. Who? lost some of its original impact with the dissolution of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War, but retains considerable appeal as a mystery and character study. The book was made into a so-so British film of the same name in 1974.\u00a0\"1999-05-15-LHERITAGE-06b\"<\/p>\n

ROGUE MOON (1960) One after another, astronauts entering a structure of unknown origin on the moon have all wound up dead. With deep reservations the aerospace people enlist a fearless troubleshooter with secret service experience to help them solve the riddle. The characterization work here is extremely thin, but the memorable plot has raised the book to cult classic status and carried it into the American Science Fiction Writers Hall of Fame.\u00a0\"1999-05-15-LHERITAGE-06c\"<\/p>\n

MICHAELMAS (1977) Laurent Michaelmas, globally recognized television journalist but secretly an engineering genius as well, has built an intelligent talking computer capable of transferring data to or from virtually any networked computer in the world. He and \u201cDomino\u201d benevolently influence world events, stabilizing an economy here, discouraging a war there. They sense a forthcoming challenge to their control, though, when a recent space shuttle explosion fatality reappears, healthy and intact. The duo ranges from the U.S. to Switzerland to North Africa to find out more. Michaelmas is generally considered Budrys\u2019 masterpiece, and certainly surpasses his earlier works in terms of literary style. \u00a0 T.G.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

By Tom Gregg He was again looking out at night-softened Manhattan. \u201cAre you still confident that no one has deduced our -ah- personal dynamic ? \u201d \u201cPerfectly confident.\u201d Domino was shocked at the suggestion. \u00a0\u201cNo one knows that you and I run the world.\u00a0\u2014 Algis Budrys, Michaelmas Science Fiction deals largely with the future, but …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":2748,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[70],"tags":[146,78],"class_list":["post-2747","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","","category-history-1900","tag-greeg-t","tag-lith-heritage"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.draugas.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2747","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.draugas.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.draugas.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.draugas.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.draugas.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2747"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.draugas.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2747\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.draugas.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2748"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.draugas.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2747"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.draugas.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2747"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.draugas.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2747"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}